Most of you might have heard of ChatGPT these days. It’s an AI chatbot that can do an amazing number of things from selling sprockets to writing episodes of “Friends.”
Because I am busy this week I’ve outsourced the Friday Funny to ChatGPT.
I blame the robots for taking my job.
Tell a humorous story about cash bail.
One humorous story about cash bail involves a man who was arrested for a minor offense and taken to the local jail. When it came time to pay his bail, the man realized that he had left his wallet at home and didn’t have any cash on him. He asked the jailer if he could pay his bail with a credit card, but the jailer said that was not allowed.
The man then remembered that he had a gift card for a popular fast food restaurant in his pocket. He offered to
When a trademark holder’s rights are infringed, which is to say, when a Junior trademark proprietor sells a product or service under the banner of a trademark excessively similar to the trademark of a Senior holder (who sells similar goods/services), the Senior may be eligible to recover damages under the Lanham Act. The Trademark Act of 1946, or the Lanham Act, is the Federal trademark statute which governs trademark law in the United States. The purpose of filing a trademark infringement lawsuit under the Lanham Act is to stop the infringer from continuing the infringing activity (“Injunctive Relief”) and hopefully, recover monetary damages for the harm caused by the infringement.
While injunctive relief is undoubtedly the most common category of “relief”, Monetary relief (damages), while less common, is equally if not more desirable than injunctive relief. There are several different types of monetary damages that
Authorized data management appears to be on the rise. Principal in industrial law is an individual, legal or pure, who authorizes an agent to act to create one or more legal relationships with a 3rd occasion. Different lemon legislation corporations charge further contingency” charges or other out of pocket charges, we don’t.
Worldwide Divorce Lawyer
The mission of the Schoonmaker Legal Group, LLC is to offer effective, ethical and professional representation to shoppers in appeals and family legislation matters in Connecticut. All forms may be stuffed out online or printed and stuffed out by hand. Established in 2007, Chaiken Legal Group gives its shoppers with legal and enterprise counsel in the areas of Business Real Property, Business and Industrial Legislation, Contracts, Company, Leisure Law and Mental Property.
If you don’t find the varieties you’re searching for here, go to the Get Legal Info menu and select a topic space or …
In 2012, at the request of the ABA Journal, Dan Hull and I wrote an article about the importance of mentoring, both as a duty of experienced lawyers to give back and a duty of new lawyers to get up to speed as quickly and effectively as possible for the sake of clients. Despite their having asked for the article, and our having put in the time to write it, the ABA Journal decided not to publish it because they felt our expectations of young lawyers to be good mentees was too hard and might hurt their feelings.
But mentoring has been a very important part of my career, and I’ve mentored many law students and young lawyers over the years. Some have been white. Some black and brown. Some male. Some female. None told me they were of another orientation, but that doesn’t mean they weren’t. With a couple
A few years back, I queried whether David Cole, the legal director of the organization that uses the legacy name American Civil Liberties Union, could save the ACLU from becoming the apologist for the termination of civil liberties and the enforcer of the woke brand of political correctness. Experience since suggests that he won’t be its savior.
Cole has now pounded the final nail in his coffin in what may be one of the most shamefully unprincipled arguments ever proffered to eradicate constitutional rights and subjugate people to the will of the woke.
Can an artist be compelled to create a website for an event she does not condone? That’s the question the Supreme Court has said it will take up on Monday, when it hears oral arguments in 303 Creative v. Elenis. The answer would seem to be obviously “no.”
Not that it applies here, as SJ does not exist for “profit-making purposes,”* but the New York lege enacted a new law that would require any website that allows users to post public comments to become the hate speech police by calling it “hateful conduct” rather than hate speech, which is fully protected by the First Amendment and for which liability is precluded by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Not that New York cared.
The law forces internet platforms of all stripes to publish a policy explaining how they will respond to online expression that could “vilify, humiliate, or incite violence” based on a protected class, like religion, gender, or race. The law also requires the platforms to create a way for visitors to complain about “hateful” content or comments, and mandates that they answer complaints with a direct response. Refusal to comply could mean investigations from
It’s not the Onion. It’s not even surprising. It is, however, nuts.
To what does the absurd delusion relate? Twitter. Or to be more precise, Twitter’s decision to eliminate all mention of the New York Post’s story about Hunter Biden’s laptop. Matt Taibbi tells the story in a twitstream of how internal Twitter emails show that it was a deliberate, unprincipled, choice by Twitter to eradicate this story from its site. This might have been at the behest of the Biden campaign, but the choice belonged entirely to Twitter. And Twitter had the right to do so.
This was no mystery, even at the time it happened. The Post, a conservative tabloid that tended to go off the edge of reason and reality on occasion, was nonetheless a longstanding newspaper and wrote about something it deemed newsworthy. That the story couldn’t be posted on Twitter did not somehow magically escape
Our Data offering ensures that ALG attorneys and clients are up to date on legal developments, and in particular on the business influence of authorized adjustments for companies. Contract Negotiation, given the above talked about earlier skilled authorized experience we’re able to advise shoppers about the best way to go about legal contracts and are able to connect them with the appropriate professional lawyers.
Real Estate Regulation — Bates Authorized Group
Court Types can be found at all LLRC places. Generally, a person is presumed by legislation to have constructive knowledge about specific fact or condition. Our client-pushed method has helped us emerge as a frontrunner in estate planning, probate and trust administration and litigation. Gale LegalForms offers a wide selection of important state-particular (and multi-state) authorized types which may be custom-made for the most common legal procedures.
Follow the directions for the Baby Care Agreement when finishing this way. …
My mean-ass editor wrote a post earlier this week outlining San Francisco’s recent decision to use remote controlled “killer robots” to beef up their police force. Being something of a fan of the sci-fi genre, I pointed out in the film “Terminator: Salvation” Skynet — the artificial intelligence villain of the Terminator series of films — was actually based in what remained of San Francisco. At the time, I made the remark that police using killer robots was essentially one step closer to Skynet becoming self-aware.
A reader opined that instead of T-800s “serving and protecting” us in the future we might see cyborg cops like Alex Murphy, the protagonist in the film “Robocop.” At the time I had to bite my tongue, because the reader was being very nice but wrong about everything. Plus there’s kind of rules around here in case you haven’t noticed about keeping subjects on
The question is not (I repeat, not) whether people who are suffering from mental illness and homelessness need and deserve societal care and concern. They do. They do for their sake. They do for our sake. They do. But as passionately as some want to either help them out of compassion or be rid of them out of annoyance, there remains one thing that we learned all too well following the Willowbrook scandal (thanks, Geraldo) and the horrors of forced institutionalization of the mentally ill. They, too, have rights.
Ironically, we superimpose our sensibilities and rationalizations on the mentally ill. We blame the lack of community mental health resources. We blame the lack of affordable housing. Makes complete sense, except that it fails to explain why people choose not to take available medication and refuse public accommodations. That anyone would make these choices seems to us, well,
